Tyranny of the Urban Statists
Governor Northam is governor of the
state of Virginia because he won three areas, northern Virginia near
Washington DC, Richmond and the Norfolk area. 79 of Virginia's 95
counties did not have majority votes for him. But the 16 counties
that did go for him did so in a big way and he ended up winning by
nine points. There is no question he won the popular vote but
geographically, the vast majority of Virginia did not support him.
Because he has chosen to rule as a
statist and not as a defender of rights, there has been a backlash
from that geographic majority. 91 of Virginia's 95 counties have
voted to become second amendment sanctuaries which means that even
some of the counties that went for him have rejected his anti gun
proposals and statist agenda. What is happening in Virginia is
symptomatic of a conflict that has been growing for a number of
decades and becoming ever more impassioned.
This conflict is between the values of
urban residents and the inhabitants of rural areas and small towns.
People who live in or near large cities expect a pervasive,
autocratic and active government. People in what is often called
“small town America” are more suspicious of government and rely
on themselves and local communities to solve problems. In
Virginia, the people living in the central and western part of the
state are not interested in Northam's autocratic proposals reflecting
the statist ideals of the urban centers of Washington, Richmond, and
Norfolk that delivered him the governorship.
This situation is reflected in
national elections. In 2016 President Trump won 81% of the counties
in the United States reflecting 84% of its geographic area. But
Hillary Clinton won 88 of the largest 100 counties and it gave her a
popular vote edge. In 2008, President Obama won 28% of the counties,
in 2012, only 22%. It is clear that urban areas trend statist
democrat. The fifty largest cities account for 15% of the country's
population and the vast majority, particularly the ones with
populations over one million, are run by statist democrats, and run
badly. It is these cities that have often provided us with the most
corrupt and moronic public officials.
“A
people that elect corrupt politicians, impostors, thieves and
traitors are not victims, but accomplices.” George Orwell
Little of this would be of consequence
if government officials, particularly at the state and national
level, would confine themselves to their proper role of merely
protecting natural rights. However, that ship sailed a very long
time ago. Now government is in everything and does anything, all
its officials ignore their oaths of fidelity to the constitution, and
we have majority rule, the rule of the mob. That mob lives in the
cities where corruption is rampant, government regulates minutia and
societal mores are reduced to absurdity. So when the joint smoking,
gun grabbing, sugar banning, surveilling, taxing, welfare state
loving transvestite uses the power of government to force compliance
with his views on gun toting, bible thumping, independent minded
rural people, there is going to be conflict.
Elections have consequences but in a
republic it is not winner take all, do as you please, carte blance.
Citizens do not go to the voting booth to select a tyrant for the
next two, four or six years. The losers should not be plundered and
enslaved. But this is where we are. Each election is about who gets
to plunder whom, who gets to wield the vast power of the state for
whose benefit, whose values are forced on whom. Is it any wonder our
elections have become so contentious and politics so vulgar and
noxious? We cannot have an active state and personal liberty. We
must choose. Only the return of small, limited government that
protects the rights of all equally will foster the civility and
harmony we all prefer.
Comments