Bank Slavery and the American Dream
What is the most important statistic
in your life? Your weight? Your income? The number of twitter
followers? How about your credit score? Isn't the ability to
achieve the American Dream based on this number above all others?
The purchase of the home on the cul-de-sac, the nice car with driver
assist and leather seats, the credit card with cash back and airline
miles with no blackout dates are all on the list of must haves for
the average American. The ability to get almost anything these days
is tied to one's credit score because so much of life's stuff is
bought with credit. That means the banking industry is indispensable
to modern life and has become the richest and most powerful force in
our lives.
“The rich rule over the poor, and
the borrower is slave to the lender.” Proverbs 22:7
“A vast accession of strength from
their younger recruits, who, having nothing in them of the feelings
or principles of ’76, now look to a single and splendid government
of an aristocracy, founded on banking institutions, and monied
incorporations under the guise and cloak of their favored branches of
manufactures, commerce and navigation, riding and ruling over the
plundered ploughman and beggared yeomanry.” Thomas Jefferson
We have allowed a bank to determine
our quality of life by determining our purchasing power; how much we
can borrow. It determines the house you can afford or what car you
can buy. But the influence on our lives goes so much deeper.
Bankers have used the wealth they accumulate from all that interest
and from their positions in the corporate world into political power
to protect and further their interests They and their
corporate debtors have sought to open markets around the world to
increase their wealth. Those markets are often in countries that
have not always been stable or accommodating and the United States
has gone to war on many occasions not because American interests were
threatened, but the banker's interests. Bankers have used their
wealth to buy politicians and a revolving door of government
appointments ensure their voice is heard loud and clear. They have
used their power and influence to steer policy, both foreign and
domestic, to protect their assets, profits and to secure their
indispensability to the nation and as many people as possible.
Banks, since their development in the
last millennia, have always exerted power in a cozy relationship with
the state. Big banks have financed wars and other ambitions of
monarchs.. They lent to the state knowing the state would always be
able to tax the people for repayment until, of course, they became
overextended and the wars stopped paying dividends, or were lost.
This led to state bankruptcy and they bankrupted quite a few; some,
like the king of Spain, more than once. In the young United States,
thrift, small government, abhorrence of debt and a dislike for
foreign wars and empire kept this trend at bay for the first hundred
years. A national, central bank was tried twice and failed. Banking
remained small, decentralized and did not play much of a part of the
everyday life of Americans.
Credit started to become accepted and
widespread with the advent of the modern world. It started with, of
all things, the Singer sewing machine. Singer realized that if they
sold the machines on credit, what was known as “installment”
buying, they would sell a lot more because few people had enough cash
on hand to purchase them. By the early 1900's radios, refrigerators
and all kinds of new consumer items were bought with installment
plans. These were not loans offered by banks, banks avoided consumer
lending, it was credit offered by the manufacturer. This meant
credit remained decentralized among all the companies offering it.
Big banking grew in America in the
late 1800's, J.P. Morgan usually being the face of this development.
These banks loaned to corporations and big businesses. They were
very careful and often demanded a seat on the board of the debtor to
assure the business remained profitable and would repay the loan. If
not, the bank would sometimes take over the business and run the
company itself. They grew rich and powerful and used that power to
utilize the apparatus of government to protect their profits. For
example, in the decades surrounding the turn of the century (1900)
America embraced a number of foreign adventures. Not because the
Philippines, Cuba, Haiti, China, Panama or Nicaragua were threats,
or part of the vital interests of the United States as a whole, but
because corporate-banking interests were either threatened, or their
growth was being hindered, by a recalcitrant government. This
culminated in the United States entering World War One to secure
allied victory and the repayment of the massive amounts of money lent
to France and Britain. After the war those same banks lent money to
Germany so they could pay reparations and the Allies would continue
to repay their loans. What could possibly go wrong?
“The real truth of the matter is,
and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has
owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
Franklin Roosevelt
Morgan and his friends were large
enough to actually bail out the US Government in the mid 1890's
during one of the periodic economic downturns, the “Panic” of
1893. This was reminiscent of the private banks putting the crown in
their debt in the Old World. So how was this power removed from
these bankers? The US Government put their stamp of approval on a
plan run by these same bankers to form a private central bank
to do the same thing.
In 1913 J. P. Morgan, Rockefeller and
other big banking players created a money empire, a monolithic
edifice whose dark shadow fell over everything, destroying the very
foundations of the republic and making the free citizens of the
United States into slaves for the banking cartel. Hyperbole? No,
unfortunately not. If one controls the money, one has all the power.
Before 1913, money in America was controlled by the people or the
people's representatives. Money was real, gold and silver, or it was
backed by those historically valuable metals. No longer. Now money
was controlled by the Federal Reserve Bank, a private bank created
and run by the banking interests. These banks would now control
national interest rates, loan money they created out of thin air to
their members at low rates who in turn, lent it to others at higher
rates. Before the Fed, banks had to be very cautious about lending
because they were on the hook for everything; and a lot of banks
failed, mainly because they mixed deposit and investment functions.
With the Fed acting as lender of last resort, and later FDIC, FHA and
other government programs acting as insurers (putting taxpayers on
the hook), standards fell. Printing volumes of notes to manipulate
the money supply has lead to a 95% drop in the value of the dollar.
Inflation destroys savings, benefits banks and Wall Street and
confiscates the wealth of the citizens. They lend money they create
out of thin air to the government to be paid back with the real
earnings of you and I. The government uses that money to finance
wars and expensive and expansive social programs.
“Without big banks, socialism would
be impossible.” Vladimir Lenin
“If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation
and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up
around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their
property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent
their fathers conquered.” Thomas Jefferson
However, the evils of the Fed are a
topic for another time. I want to talk about our slavery to the
private banks and how they have made the American dream attainable
only through themselves and their credit system. Fed caused
inflation is part of what makes prices go up. But it is not the only
thing. By making financing a normal part of buying an item, the
question before a purchase is not “How much does it cost” but
“What monthly payment can you afford?” If a long term, low
monthly payment can be arranged, it doesn't matter that you will pay
two, three or four times the value of an item, it only matters that
you can have it now. With payment amount being the deciding factor,
price can be adjusted upward to fit the payment-and it is.
Consider the difference in price
increases in items that are financed and those that are not. As a
base percentage we can use the median wage. In 1913 average yearly
income was around $1300. In 2008 it was $37,300, an increase of
2,885%. The price of milk, bread, eggs and gasoline increased
1,250%, 2,246%, 710% and 1250% respectively, all less than wage
increases which means they actually cost less than they did,
as a percentage of income, in 1913. Productivity increases from
technology and science have brought down costs for many consumer
items.
Now, look at the increases for cars
and homes. From 1913 to 2008 they increased 5673% and 6074%
respectively. What do these things have in common? Its not that
they are technological innovations; the price of televisions and
computers have come down over the decades. The purchase of a home
or car assumes financing by the banks. The home or car you
can afford is not based on the price you can pay but the monthly
payment you can afford. A monthly payment that includes interest
that will usually result in you paying two to three times the
purchase price. The expectation is that we will be making these
payments for our whole lives. We will always buy another car
and finance it, buy a bigger house with a bigger loan, buy furniture
and other things on credit so the interest is always being paid. All
that money goes into the coffers of the banking cartels who buy more
power and influence. Of course the government could not let the
banks have all these obscene profits. With the creation of
Fannie Mae and Freddi Mac along with the takeover of the lucrative
student loan industry, they too can reap the profits. This really
ends up being a 70%+ consumption tax. Everyone gets rich except you
and I.
With all this lending going on, the
net worth of most Americans has dropped to very low levels. An
economic downturn or a price collapse and repayment becomes a problem
for so many who live paycheck to paycheck, or close to it. The banks
have the Fed and the U.S. government to bail them out.
However, all that government bailout money needs to come from
somewhere and those loans are still outstanding. One way or another,
that money needs to be repaid to the banks, the government or the
Fed. They can't really trust you or I to continue as willing
participants in this scheme for power and money. Therefore, you and
your assets need to be accessible so they can take what they need to
ensure the financial health of the banking cartels and a steady
stream of government revenue. They want their theft to be easy and
unhindered.
The ultimate way to achieve this is in
a cashless society. A society in which the movement, storage and use
of money is completely under the watchful eye of the government and
banking interests. Government will always be able to get tax revenue
and the banks will always be able to get their loan payments. No
only that, but they will be able to see every purchase, every
payment. They will know what you eat, what you wear, the
medicines you purchase, your entertainment choices; there will be no
secrets, no privacy. This also means banks and government will
have the power to discriminate against certain activities and
businesses, refusing to lend or process transactions, just as some
banks are currently doing with firearm manufacturers and retailers.
The power to control the use of money is to control life itself. To
deny purchasers the right to buy what they need and desire is the
ultimate power, rationing without calling it rationing, steering
people to or away from activities or consumption by denying them the
ability to spend. Once government is completely responsible for
heath care it will truly be life and death. They may deny treatment
based on purchase history; too many 'big gulps', deny certain care
care; can't pay for 'alternative' (unlicensed) medicine, or refuse to
pay for treatment for 'undesirables' who may be categorized as
mentally unstable for the crime of expressing a non-government
approved opinion.
What can we do? We all have a choice
as to whether we become a slave to the banks or not. We have a
choice on whether we live as free people or tributary slaves. Unlike
health insurance, we are not forced by threat of government penalty
to borrow money. We choose to do so, or not. What if we all
stopped financing cars, only paying cash for what we could
actually afford. No payments, no interest. Sure, most of us would
have to buy used but what would happen to the price of new cars if
people would only pay what they could afford in cash? Would a new
car cost a years income or more or would it cost a third of that as
it did in 1913?
Housing is a little more difficult but
we've done it before. The modern mortgage had its start with the
Roosevelt's FHA, less that one hundred years ago. Before that people
borrowed only half or less of a home's value for five to seven years,
often from an insurance company that was hoping for a default so they
could add properties to their balance sheet. But by opening home
ownership up to many more people by lowering the down payment and
lengthening the term, a home became more than simply a roof over our
heads, it was an investment; which meant banks had a stake in
it. Longer terms increase the amount of interest paid. But we could
make the sacrifice for the smaller home that would require shorter
terms and less interest. We could rent. We could build with our own
two hands, paying as we go. We could try community or family based
financing. There are options, free people will come up with them,
they always do.
What about our savings and
investments? Our digital transaction world? Drop out. What
if we all took our money out of the banks, bought big safes and big
guns to keep our property secure from the digital criminals and the
criminals in government. What if we paid cash for everything instead
of leaving a digital trail for Google to manipulate and the NSA to
use? What if we started using real money like gold and silver or
even cryptocurrency instead of the worthless paper notes the Federal
Reserve has saddled us with? We would be free, our lives would be
private, and our property would not be at the mercy of dark forces.
But eroding public confidence and
encouraging non-participation would collapse the system! A system of
theft and manipulation? Good riddance. But some fear
decentralization, innovation and personal responsibility. These will
be the ones calling instead for more government
regulation-what a joke! Isn't it obvious to all that the bankers
have bought and paid for most politicians, that the endless parade of
bankers in and out of government “service” means that regulation
is nothing more than regulated theft? By claiming government
oversight of their activities the banks create the illusion of
trustworthiness, all the while continuing their corrupt practices
under the umbrella of the law. No, I would like to see complete
deregulation where banks need to stand on their own reputations with
no hope for government bailouts or assistance. Complete transparency
will reveal the corruption and the true thieves and con artists will
be prosecuted. I would like to see trust in banks destroyed, only to
be very slowly rebuilt under the watchful eye of a free and wary
public.
The banking cartels have used and
manipulated us for their own benefit. They have encouraged our base
instincts; our greed, envy and desire, encouraging us to seek that
which we cannot afford without their help, help that makes us slaves.
They have used the wealth they accumulate from our weakness to take
the reins of government and use it to further their interests, even
when those interests are at odds with the safety, health, reputation
and ideals upon which this nation was founded. That has often
resulted in real blood being shed, in addition to the figurative
blood they squeeze out of us every day. It is time to get out from
under their tyranny. This is one form of slavery that is very much
under our control if we are willing to make the small sacrifices
necessary to become free of their oppression and manipulation. It
will be better for you and I as individuals, our country, and the
world, if their power is broken.
Comments